JOURNAL OF THE LINGUISTIC
|
VOLUME 76, NUMBER 1 |
MARCH 2000 |
Adult and child understanding of simple William Philip 1
Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of Jennifer E. Arnold, 28
structural complexity and discourse Thomas Wasow,
status on constituent ordering Anthony
Losongco,
& Ryan Ginstrom
Linking as constraints on word classes Anthony R. Davis & 56
in a hierarchical lexicon Jean-Pierre Koenig
Spanish stress assignment within the David Eddington 92
analogical
modeling of language
The successful introductory course: Cari L. Spring, Michael 110
Bringing the gap for the nonmajor Flynn, Brian Joseph, Rae
Moses,
Susan Steele, &
Charlotte
Webb
The characterization of exclamative Raffaella Zanuttini & 123
clauses
in Paduan Paul
Portner
Discussion Note:
Scope, structure, and expert systems: Joseph Aoun & Yenhui 133
A
reply to Kuno et al. Audrey
Li
Reviews:
Slobin (ed.): The crosslinguistic study of M. Thomas 156
language acquisition, vol. 4;
The crosslinguistic study of language
acquisition, vol. 5: Expanding the contexts
Escure: Creole and dialect continua C. Clements 158
Van Kemenade & Vincent (eds.): Parameters S. Frisch 161
of morphosyntactic change
Lapointe et al. (eds.): Morphology and its M. Maxwell 164
relation to phonology and syntax
Newmeyer: Language form and language function E. Moravcsik 168
O’Grady: Syntactic development S. Dubinsky 171
Hamano: The sound-symbolic system of Japanese M. U. Fidler 174
McDaniel et al. (eds.): Methods for assessing M. B. Olsen 177
children’s syntax
Giorgi & Pianesi: Tense and aspect: C. Tenny 180
From semantics to morphology
McGregor: Semiotic grammar Y. Tobin 182
Lee: Talking heads: Language, metalanguage, W. Frawley 186
and the semiotics of subjectivity
Russom: Beowulf and Old Germanic metre C. B. McCully 188
Collins & Mees: The real Professor Higgins: P. Ladefoged 191
The life and career of Daniel Jones
Wolfram & Schilling-Estes: American English: J. Algeo 194
Dialects and variation
Abstracts:
Adult and child understanding of simple
reciprocal sentences
According to a standard view, the reciprocal pronoun has a fixed semantic value that defines a relation of weak reciprocity, and any stronger readings it may appear to have are pragmatic or lexical interactive effects (Fiengo & Lasnik 1973, Langendoen 1978). Darymple et al. 1995 counterproposes that the reciprocal pronoun has a flexible semantic value defining a range of readings of varying logical strength and that a semantic principle determines the reading required for a given reciprocal sentence on the basis of the meaning of its predicate. This article presents psycholinguistic evidence from adult speakers of English, Norwegian, and Dutch, and from child speakers of Dutch and Norwegian, which supports Darymple et al.’s analysis of the lexical content of the reciprocal pronoun but which also strongly suggests that the interpretive principle they posit is pragmatic rather than semantic in nature.
Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and
discourse status on constituent ordering
Thomas Wasow
Anthony Losongco
Ryan Ginstrom
Variations in postverbal constituent ordering have been attributed to both grammatical complexity (heaviness) and discourse status (newness), although few studies compare the two factors explicitly. Through corpus analysis and experimentation, we demonstrate that both factors simultaneously and independently influence word order in two English constructions. While past investigations of these factors have focused on their effects in language comprehension, we argue that postponing heavy and new constituents facilitates processes of planning and production.
Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon
Jean-Pierre Koenig
We propose an account of linking patterns that does away with intermediary mechanisms such as thematic or actor/undergoer hierarchies. Instead, constraints on word classes, defined by both syntactic and semantic criteria, encode generalizations between semantic roles and syntactic arguments. We show that the generalizations a linking theory needs to capture can be modeled via the same mechanisms as other lexical generalizations, using conditions specified within the hierarchy of word classes. Each condition provides a partial specification of the mapping between semantic roles and syntactic arguments. We argue that this constraint-based, verb-class-based view of linking offers several empirical advantages: partial regularities and exceptions are easily accommodated, fine-grained semantic distinctions relevant to linking are countenanced, and cross-cutting similarities between semantic and syntactic verb classes are economically captured.
Spanish stress assignment within the analogical modeling of
language
The advent of nonlinear phonology has resulted in an explosion of studies relating to Spanish syllable structure and stress placement, but most of these studies claim to represent linguistic competence and language structure, not actual mechanisms used by speakers in speech production and comprehension.
The present study is couched within Skousen’s analogical modeling of language (AML) (1989, 1992, 1995). AML attempts to reflect how speakers determine linguistic behaviors such as stress placement. According to AML, when an unfamiliar word needs to be stressed, speakers access their mental lexicon, search for words similar to the word in question, then apply the stress of the word(s) found to the word in question.
The 4,970 most common Spanish words served as a database for the study. AML correctly assigned stress to about 94% of these words. The errors it made closely reflect the pattern of errors made by Spanish-speaking children in a study by Hochberg (1988). Moreover, Aske’s nonce word probe (1990) showed that native speakers are sensitive to a certain subpattern in Spanish stress assignment—a subpattern which does not receive representation in rule models. The analogical model of Spanish stress mirrors Aske’s findings.
The successful introductory course: Bringing
the gap for the nonmajor
Michael Flynn
Brian Joseph
Rae Moses
Susan Steele
Charlotte Webb
The introductory linguistics course is the primary antidote that academic linguistics can offer to commonly held, yet basically wrong-headed, views about language. It is essential, therefore, that this course be meaningful to the nonmajor student. Through a series of five vignettes, each by a different author and representing a variety of institutional types, we explore options other than ‘baby’ theoretical linguistics to the introductory linguistics course. A fundamental conclusion to these vignettes is that success in reaching the nonmajor turns on taking account of the institutional context and the student population and tailoring courses to be sensitive to these variables. This conclusion is driven home with an administrative view as to why every academic linguist and linguistics program should find the search for a successful introductory course compelling.
The characterization of exclamative clauses in
Paduan
Paul Portner
In this descriptive report we outline the structural pattern of exclamative clauses in Paduan. Because of the close similarity between the exclamative and interrogative clauses in this language, we begin by developing a number of tests which allow us to distinguish these two clause types. We then present the range of exclamative structures. A variety of factors interact to mark a clause as an exclamative, yielding a quite complex array of facts. We view this work as the basis for future study in the syntax and semantics of exclamatives.
|
Lojenga: Ngiti: A Central-Sudanic language of Zaire.......................................................... B. Wald |
197 |
|
Neukom: Description grammaticale du nateni (Bénin): Système verbal, classification nominale, phrases complexes, textes................. J. Banks |
197 |
|
Hübler: The expressivity of grammar: Grammatical devices expressing emotion across time............................................... A. Bruflat |
198 |
|
Bunt & Tomita (eds.): Recent advances in parsing
technology................ M.
A. Covington |
198 |
|
Fludernik: Towards a ‘natural’ narratology........................................................................... D.
Herman |
199 |
|
Forget et al. (eds.): Negation and polarity: Syntax and
semantics................. A.
Pietarinen |
200 |
|
Romaine: Communicating gender.............................................................................................. Z.
Salzmann |
201 |
|
Talbot: Language and gender: An introduction............................................................... Z.
Salzmann |
201 |
|
Calvet: Language wars and linguistic politics................................................................... Z.
Salzmann |
202 |
|
Fisiak (ed.): Studies in Middle English linguistics............................................................. J.
Skaffari |
203 |
|
Ambrazas (ed.): Lithuanian grammar......................................................................................... E.
J. Vajda |
203 |
|
McArthur: The English languages...................................................................................................... M.
Aceto |
204 |
|
Stassen: Intransitive predication................................................................................................. T. J. Curnow |
205 |
|
Koerner (ed.): First person singular III: Autobiographies by North American scholars in the language sciences........................................................ J. S. Falk |
205 |
|
Coleman: Phonological representations: Their names, forms,
and powers........ S. Frisch |
206 |
|
Berg: Linguistic structure and linguistic change: Explanation from language processing.................................................................................. D. E. Holt |
207 |
|
Maynard: Principles of Japanese discourse: A handbook............................... D.
R. McCreary |
208 |
|
Nerbonne (ed.): Linguistic databases............................................................................................... B.
Rempt |
209 |
|
Gussenhoven & Jacobs: Understanding phonology...................................................... A.
Thériault |
209 |
|
Clark (ed.): The proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual child language research forum............................................................................................... E. Thompson |
210 |
|
Dik: The theory of functional grammar: Part 1: The structure of the clause (2nd edn.) Part 2: Complex and derived constructions............................................................ J-C. Verstraete |
210 |
|
Røyneland (ed.): Language contact and language
conflict.................................. E.
G. Winkler |
212 |
|
Floyd: La estructura categorial de los evidenciales en el quechua wanka............................................................................................................. A.
Y. Aikhenvald |
212 |
|
Nordlinger: Constructive case: Evidence from Australian
languages................ C.
Bowern |
213 |
|
Varile et al. (eds.): Survey of the state of the art in human language technology............................................................................................................................................... K.
B. Cohen |
214 |
|
Véronique (ed.): Matériaux pour l’étude des classes grammaticales dans les langages créoles............................................................................................................... A.
P. Grant |
214 |
|
Downes: Language and society (2nd edn.)................................................................................ A.
S. Kaye |
215 |
|
Gass et al.: Second language learning: Data analysis (2nd
edn.)............................. A.
S. Kaye |
216 |
|
Gillis & de Houwer (eds.): The acquisition of Dutch.............................................. M.
L. Louden |
217 |
|
Himmelmann: Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur.............................................................................. M.
L. Louden |
217 |
|
Maumann: The syntax of subordination............................................................................. M.
L. Louden |
218 |
|
Birner & Ward: Information status and noncanonical word order in English............................................................................................................................................................ D.
Noël |
219 |
|
Giannakidou: Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical
dependency................... A.
Pereltsvaig |
219 |
|
Schmid et al. (eds.): Historical linguistics 1997.................................................................... M.
Pierce |
220 |
|
Cherubim et al. (eds.): Sprache und bürgerliche Nation: Beiträge zure deutschen und europäischen Sprachgeschichte Des 19. Jahrhunderts............................................................................................................................. M.
Pierce |
221 |
|
Bækken: Word order patterns in Early Modern English............................................. E.
Potsdam |
222 |
|
Alexiadou: Adverb placement: A case study in antisymmetric
syntax........... E. Potsdam |
222 |
|
Augst et al.: Rechtschreibwörterbücher im Test: Subjective Einschätzungen, Benutzungserfolge und alternative
Konzepte...................... I.
U. Pufahl |
223 |
|
Paltridge: Genre, frames and writing in research settings........................................ I.
U. Pufahl |
223 |
|
Haegeman (ed.): The new comparative syntax................................................................. S.
Robinson |
224 |
|
Akatsuka et al. (eds.): Japanese/Korean linguistics, vol. 7........................................... J.
J. Song |
225 |
|
Carpenter: Type-logical semantics................................................................................................ S.
Vasishth |
226 |
|
Paradis: Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British
English................. W. S.
M. Yiu |
227 |
|
Kent: The speech sciences.............................................................................................................. G.
S. Nathan |
227 |
|
Laenzlinger: Comparative studies in word order variation: Adverbs, pronouns and clause structure in Romance and
Germanic.... J. D. Bobaljik |
228 |
|
Dahlgren: Word order in Arabic................................................................................................... B.
Bruening |
229 |
|
Bubenik: A historical syntax of late Middle Indo-Aryan
(Apaphraṃśa).. B.
Bruening |
229 |
|
Regan (ed.): Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition in social context: Crosslinguistic perspectives................................................................ S.
M. Burt |
230 |
|
Yu: The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from
Chinese.. K. S. Chung |
231 |
|
Brown & Miller (eds.): Concise encyclopedia of syntactic theories; Lamarque (ed.): Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of
language....... M. A.
Covington |
231 |
|
Bunt & Van Horck (eds.): Discontinuous constituency.................................. M.
A. Covington |
232 |
|
Bache & Davidsen-Nielsen: Mastering English: An advanced Grammar for non-native and native speakers; Klinge: Mastering English: A student’s workbook and
guide............................ D.
Deterding |
232 |
|
Burquest: Phonological analysis: A functional approach (2nd
edn.)................ P. D.
Fallon |
233 |
|
Ratcliffe: The ‘broken’ plural problem in Arabic and comparative Semitic: Allomorphy and analogy in non-concatenative morphology................................. A. Gianto |
234 |
|
Joseph et. al. (eds.): Themes in Greek linguistics II......................................... K.
K. Grohmann |
235 |
|
Hall: The phonology of coronals....................................................................... A.
Carstairs-McCarthy |
236 |
|
Bennis et al. (eds.): Atomism and binding................................................................ K.
K. Grohmann |
236 |