Language - Journal of the LSA


Table of Contents
Volume 74
Number 4 (December 1998)

 

Articles
Episodic -ee in English: A thematic role constraint on new word formation Chris Barker  695 
Hermit crabs: Formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affix substitution  Jeffrey Heath  728 
The progressive in modal semantics  Paul Portner  760 
Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class  John H. McWhorter  788
     
Discussion Note     
The rightward analysis of WH-movement in ASL: A reply to Petronio and Lillo-Martin  Carol Neidle, Dawn MacLaughlin, Robert G. Lee, Benjamin Bahan, & Judy Kegl  819 
     
Reviews     
     
Battistella: The logic of markedness  Y. Tobin  832 
Hornberger (ed.): Indigenous literacies in the Americas: Language planning from the bottom up  A. Y. Yamamoto  834 
Taylor: Possessives in English  C. Barker & M. Polinsky  838 
McCully & Anderson (eds.): English historical metrics  R. D. Fulk  844 
Tenny: Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface  S. T. Rosen  847 
Jackendoff: The architecture of the language faculty J. Aitchison  850 
Yokoyama & Klenin (eds.): Selected essays of Catherine V. Chvany  L. E. Feinberg  853 
Platts: Ways of meaning: An introduction to a philosophy of language (2nd edn.)  K. M. Jaszczolt  856 
Jespersen: A linguist's life  J. D. McCawley  861 
     
Book Notices    864
     
Publications Received    893
Index to Volume 74    897 

Back to index


ABSTRACTS

Episodic -ee in English: A thematic role constraint on new word formation
Chris Barker
University of California, San Diego

This article offers a detailed analysis of the English suffix -ee (employee, escapee, refugee, etc.) based on fifteen hundred naturally occurring tokens of some five hundred word types. The data suggest that formation of nouns in -ee is moderately but genuinely productive, and that analyses based on the syntactic argument structure of the stem verb are unsatisfactory. Instead, formation of -ee nouns systematically adheres to three essentially semantic constraints: first, the referent of an -ee noun must be sentient; second, the denotation of an -ee noun must be episodically linked (as defined below) to the denotation of its stem; and third, a use of an -ee noun entails a relative lack of volitional control on the part of its referent. I argue that these semantic constraints taken together amount to a special-purpose thematic role that actively constrains productive use of derivational morphology.

Back to index

Hermit Crabs: Formal Renewal of Morphology by Phonologically Mediated Affix Subsittution
Jeffrey Heath
University of Michigan

A grammatical affix undergoing phonetic erosion is sometimes abruptly replaced by a conveniently available lexical stem with which it shares one or more phonological segments. The new affix has the phonological shape of the old independent stem, but acquires the basic grammatical function of the old affix, though it may also bring in a portion of the stem's own morphological and semantic idiosyncrasies. Because the old affixal form is eliminated, the historical process can be easily misdiagnosed as reflecting the gradual compression of an original syntactic construction which includes the relevant independent stem. Recognition of the system-renewing element in this particular type of stem-to-affix grammaticalization leads to awareness of the pivotal role of the inherited system in grammaticalizations, and to a general critique of historical models which see grammaticalization as a straightforward syntax-to-morphology compression.

Back to index

The progressive in modal semantics
Paul Portner
Georgetown University

This article presents a semantic analysis of the English progressive as an intensional operator within the framework of modal semantics proposed by Kratzer. This treatment allows a combination of the central idea of Dowty's influential analysis, that the progressive's meaning has a major modal component, with the insights of other scholars (Parsons, Vlach, and Landman). My claim is that using a more sophisticated background theory of modality allows natural solutions for the problems raised for the modal account.

Back to index


Identifying the creole prototype: vindicating a typological class
John H. McWhorter
University of California, Berkeley

An increasingly influential current in creole studies considers there to have been no appreciable break in transmission or simplification in the birth of creole languages, instead treating creoles as gradual, relatively nondisruptive developments of their lexifiers amidst conditions of heavy language contact. Central to this superstratist view is the claim that creole is a sociohistorical, but not synchronic, term. This article outlines three features which in fact render creoles synchronically distinguishable from other languages, all three of them clear results of a break in transmission followed by a development period too brief for the traits to be undone as they have been in older languages. It is also shown that an expanded data set reveals flaws in the sociohistorical argumentation behind the superstratist framework.

Back to index

 

The rightward analysis of WH-movement in ASL: a reply to Petronio and Lillo-Martin

Carol Neidle
Boston University
Dawn McLaughlin
Boston University
Robert G. Lee
Boston University
Benjamin Bahan
Gallaudet University
Judy Kegl
Rutgers University

Neidle, Kegl, Bahan, Aarons & McLaughlin 1997 argues that rightward WH-movement in ASL constitutes a counterexample to claims by Kayne (1994) that all phrasal projections exhibit specifier-head-complement order and that syntactic movement is leftward. Petronio & Lillo-Martin 1997, although not adopting kayne's antisymmetry framework, offers a critique of our analysis and a proposal involving leftward WH-movement. Here, we argue that Petronio and Lillo-Martin's interpretations of the data are incorrect and that their analysis cannot account for the facts of the language. We therefore maintain maintainour position that ASL WH-phrases move rightward, and that universal grammar must allow the option of rightward movement.

Back to index


BOOK NOTICES IN THIS ISSUE

(Special characters may not be displayed correctly)

 

Back to index


 Previous Issue  TOC Main page Language Main page  Next Issue
 Previous Issue  TOC Main page  Language Main page  Next Issue


Comments and questions to: Martin U. Kappus (mkappus@babel.ling.upenn.edu)- January 1999